Sabtu, 31 Agustus 2019

Xem phim Disobedience 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Disobedience 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Disobedience 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-period-massively-present-2017-episode-Disobedience-punched-streaming-VHSRip-MP4-118-gal-itv-2017-non-commercial-Disobedience-cameron-Online Movie-depicted-1970s-marc-2017-slapstick-Disobedience-miniseries-cineplex-2017-WMV-needham-method-solved-2017-perfect-Disobedience-erased-MPEG-2-ghost-luke-natalie-2017-machine-Disobedience-tamil-Full Movie.jpg



Xem phim Disobedience 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Ledoux Lancret

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Lorna Swayam

Bố cục kịch bản :Tahiyya Sirine

Hình ảnh : Ellaine Lynn
Đồng tác giả : Cruz Bernie

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Yohann Mischa

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Zecca Varieur

Sản xuất : Hriday Elektra

Nhà sản xuất : Jemel Pelez

Nữ diễn viên : Genet Lereau



A woman learns about the death of her Orthodox Jewish father, a rabbi. She returns home and has romantic feelings rekindled for her best childhood friend, who is now married to her cousin.

6.9
501






Tên phim

Disobedience

Thời lượng

181 minutes

Năm sản xuất

2017-09-10

Trạng thái

MPE 1080p
BDRip

Thể loại

Drama, Romance

Ngôn ngữ

English, עִבְרִית

Diễn viên

Dyako
X.
Cherita, Allyson K. Yubo, Nahima B. Albéric





[HD] Xem phim Disobedience 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $528,538,311

Doanh thu : $852,340,500

Thể loại : Nội tâm Tiến hóa - Siêu anh hùng thông thường , Con - dịch bệnh , bởi cảnh sát - Siêu anh hùng thông thường , Cướp tài sản - Từ ngữ

Nước sản xuất : Ả Rập Xê-út

Sản xuất : Margo



**Except from a conversation about the movie:**

"I think _Disobedience_ could get some Oscar attention. It's depressing Jewish lesbians, so chances are pretty high. It was actually a pretty decent movie. Really didn't overplay the onscreen sex, which was good, but I do wish there were queer movies which were more middle of the spectrum. Seems like 99% of the time you either get hokey deliberate trash """comedies"""" made on 47c budgets like _Yeti: A Love Story_, or super serious (and almost always super grim) art-y dramas like _Moonlight_ that are very well made but also make you very upset...

Don't get me wrong, I'm very thankful for both of those types of movies, but where's like... _Die Hard_ where Bruce Willis is a shirtlifter?"

**P.S. I'm buying this soundtrack.**

**_**Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go.**_**
**_A well-told love story, set against a background of religious orthodoxy_**

> _An important point to make from the outset is that Jewish law does_ not _teach that it is forbidden to be a homosexual. On the contrary, Jewish law is concerned not with the source of a person's erotic urges nor with inner feelings, but with acts. The Torah forbids the homosexual_ act_, known as_ mishkav zakhar_, but has nothing to say about homosexuality as a state of being or a personal inclination._

> _In other words, traditionally, a person with a homosexual inclination can be an entirely observant Jew a__s long as he or she does not act out that inclination._
>
[...]

> _Lesbianism is never mentioned in the Torah. One talmudic passage refers to homosexual acts between women: "R. Huna taught, Women who have sex one with the other are forbidden to marry a Kohen." The_ Halakhah _rejects Rav Huna's opinion and allows a lesbian to marry a Kohen. However, Maimonides ruled that lesbianism is still prohibited and should be punished by flagellation. The prohibition is not as stringent as that against male homosexuality because the Torah does not explicitly prohibit les­bianism, and because lesbianism does not involve the spilling of seed._

- Rabbi Michael Gold; _Does God Belong in the Bedroom?_ (1991)

Depicting the problems that can arise when deeply held spiritual beliefs clash with notions of personal freedom, _Disobedience_ is the story of a forbidden love given a second chance. Based on Naomi Alderman's 2006 novel, written for the screen by Rebecca Lenkiewicz (_Ida_) and Sebastián Lelio, and directed by Lelio, the film covers some of the same thematic territory as Lelio's previous features; _Gloria_ (2013) deals with a 58-year-old divorcée trying to re-enter the dating scene by frequenting singles-bars, and the Oscar-winning _Una mujer fantástica_ (2017) looks at a transgender waitress trying to come to terms with the death of her boyfriend, whilst also navigating a prejudiced society. In _Disobedience_, Lelio turns his attention towards a lesbian relationship within London's relatively insular Modern Orthodox Jewish community. What all three films have in common is the centrality of a complex and strong woman facing up to (almost exclusively patriarchal) societal hostility. Kind of like a cross between Todd Haynes's _Carol_ (2015) and Daniel Kokotajlo's _Apostasy_ (2017), _Disobedience_ eschews melodrama, and is uninterested in presenting a binary story where faith is the Big Bad. Although it is certainly critical of the strictures that can result from a rigid application of _Halacha_ [Jewish religious laws] and/or a literal interpretation of the _Taryag Mitzvot_ [613 Commandments], the community itself is depicted respectfully, with the most representative Jewish character arguably the most sympathetic figure in the film. _Disobedience_ does feature a very graphic lesbian sex scene, but it's one of the most thematically justified, least exploitative sex scenes I can remember, crystallising many of Lelio's thematic concerns. Although things can be far too on the nose from time to time, Lelio's subtle and non-intrusive direction more than compensates for that, and overall, this is a fine film, both thought-provoking and moving.

The story opens in a synagogue in London as Krushka (the great Anton Lesser), the local Rav, (similar to a rabbi, except an _Halachic_ expert) delivers a sermon explaining that angels and demons are locked into their destinies, with only humanity "_free to choose_". This freedom, however, is both a privilege and a great burden, as it affords humanity the opportunity to disobey the edicts of _HaShem_ [lit. "The Name"; used to refer to God when discussing Him outside scripture]. However, before completing his sermon, Krushka keels over and dies. Meanwhile, in New York, Ronit (Rachel Weisz), his estranged and non-practising daughter gets word of his death. After getting drunk and having anonymous sex with a man in a toilet, Ronit heads back to England. At the home of her childhood friend, Dovid Kuperman (an extraordinary Alessandro Nivola), Krushka's understudy, Ronit quickly learns the community is not especially pleased to see her, as the shadow under which she left has not dissipated. Despite this, and although he wasn't expecting her, Dovid is happy to let Ronit stay with him and his wife, who, Ronit is stunned to learn, is her former best friend, Esti (Rachel McAdams). The film then plays out over the next few days, as the community prepares for Krushka's _levaya_ [funeral], as it becomes apparent that Ronit and Esti were once more than friends, which may, or may not, have had something to do with Ronit's departure and her estrangement from her father. However, the more time they spend in one another's company, the more their once-held passion for one another bubbles to the surface.

Thematically, _Disobedience_ is far more concerned with the clash of views that results from Ronit's return than it is with condemning the beliefs of the community _per se_. When she first arrives at Dovid's house, she instinctively reaches out to hug him, forgetting about _negiah_ [the forbidding of physical contact between men and women not related by blood, or married], and he immediately, although not unkindly, recoils. This tells us both how long she has been away, and how thoroughly she has rejected the doctrines of the faith. Later, there is an exceptionally awkward (but very funny) _Shabbat_ [Jewish day of rest] meal, where Ronit seems to take great delight in being as outrageous as possible, riling up the assembled guests with her progressive worldview. In a discussion about the role of women in society, for example, she points out that every time a woman gets married and takes her husband's surname, a part of that woman's history is erased. This kind of ideological conflict, however, is also found _within_ the characters themselves. Esti, for example, is torn between her desire for Ronit on the one hand, and her commitment to Dovid and her belief in their faith on the other. For her part, Ronit too internalises discord; although she has been estranged from him for many years, she is genuinely hurt to learn just how completely Krushka had divorced himself of her memory, seen most clearly when his obituary refers to him as "_sadly childless_".

Tellingly, during the _Shabbat_ dinner, Dovid tries to play peacekeeper, whilst a couple of cutaways to Esti show her smiling to herself as Ronit burrows under the skin of those present. This kind of delicate touch on Lelio's part can be seen throughout the film, with numerous wordless gestures allowing the actors to convey backstory in lieu of exposition. For example, after Ronit arrives, although Dovid recoils when she tries to hug him, and although when she tries to light up a cigarette in his kitchen, he asks her to smoke in the garden, he accompanies her outside, shielding the flame from the wind in a gesture both kind and intimate. Another excellent example is found later that night as Dovid and Esti prepare for bed, and Esti gently and playfully strokes his beard, suggesting her genuine affection for him.

On paper, the story might lend itself to a condemnation of the kind of social suffocation and emotional repression that can result from fundamentalism. Instead, however, the film spends time building a respectful, if not idealised, picture of the community's beliefs and practices. Although no-one is especially happy that Ronit is back, they are never openly hostile, the way Hasidic Jews, for example, might be. A key part of this respect is Dovid himself, played by Nivola (in an Oscar-worthy career-best performance) as an inherently decent and honourable man; when Ronit returns, he is the only one to extend her a genuine welcome. In a less nuanced film, Dovid would be a fire-and-brimstone obstacle to Ronit and Esti's happiness, a Roger Chillingworth-type personification of traditionalism and rigidity. Instead he is presented as someone who, like Esti, faces a difficult choice – that between his communal position and his faith on the one hand, and his genuine love of Esti and affection for Ronit on the other, his lifelong devotion to the _Tanakh_ [Hebrew Bible] conflicting with the modern day progressive sensibilities that come from living in a metropolis. Indeed, perhaps Dovid's most salient characteristic is conflict – when he tries to lay down the law to Esti regarding her conduct, his heart never seems in it; when he expresses disgust at her tryst with Ronit, he almost seems embarrassed to be reacting the way he is. This conflict is manifested aesthetically in a scene where Dovid is addressing the synagogue. Lelio films the scene in such a tight close-up, that every time Nivola moves even slightly off his mark, he goes out of focus. It's a brilliant example of content generating form, and is typical of Lelio's directorial lightness of touch.

However, for all that, the film never lets you forget that this is a community of _negiah_, where married women must wear a _sheitel_ [wig] in public, and where the genders are strictly divided at religious services. As Ronit and Esti discuss their sexuality, Esti points out that she and Dovid have sex every Friday night, "_as is expected_", and that the reason she was married to Dovid in the first place was that Krushka hoped "_marriage would cure_" her, a concept not a million miles away from homosexual conversion therapy. In this sense, although respectful of the community, even depicting some of the communal benefits of such a tight-knit group, the film does challenge some of the tenets of their belief system, particularly its rigid traditionalism and myopic sexism, both of which feel increasingly out of place in the early 21st-century. In this, _Disobedience_ fits very much into Lelio's _oeuvre_, with all three of his films dealing with repressive _milieus_ placing restrictions on women.

Obviously, a major theme throughout is sexuality. Much has been made of the sex scene between Ronit and Esti, with some critics accusing it of being little more than titillation at best, a graphic example of the male gaze at worst. However, this reading is to completely miss the point of the scene in relation to the narrative as a whole. There are actually two sex scenes in the film; one between Ronit and Esti, and the other between Esti and Dovid. And although they couldn't be more different, they also couldn't exist without one another, as the abandonment, lust, and sense of pressure being released when Esti is with Ronit contrasts sharply with the detached, formulaic, and passionless scene with Dovid; the two scenes explicitly comment on one another, each hinting at the meaning to be found in its counterpart. In this, they recall the four sex scenes in David Cronenberg's _A History of Violence_ (2005) and Abdellatif Kechiche's _La Vie d'Adèle – Chapitres 1 & 2_ (2013), two sets of two scenes which, again, comment upon and contextualise one another. The scene between Ronit and Esti is the physical manifestation of the characters' long-repressed desire for one another, a release of the yearning that has been building up for years. It's a wholly justified narrative moment, and a completely necessary beat for the two characters. It's not an aside or a piece of voyeuristic male fantasy, it's the centre of the whole film. Together, the two scenes represent Esti's binary choice – an unbridled and sexually fulfilling, but unstable relationship with Ronit, or a dutiful and dull, but respectful and secure relationship with Dovid.

If I had one major criticism, it would be that although Lelio's direction is extremely subtle, some of his and Lenkiewicz's writing choices are spectacularly on the nose. The opening sermon is a good example – a religious diatribe whose subject is mankind's freedom to choose, the concomitant ability to disobey, and the notion that freedom is impossible without sacrifice, in a film about these very same issues. Another example is that Dovid and his _yeshiva_ students are discussing the one book of the _Tanakh_ dealing with sexuality rather than spirituality, the _Song of Songs_, whilst Esti's secondary school students are studying adultery in _Othello_. The worst example of this, however, is found when Ronit and Esti go to Krushka's house and Ronit turns on the radio, which just so happens to be playing The Cure's "Lovesong", a song which perfectly encapsulates their situation ("_Whenever I'm alone with you/You make me feel like I am home again_"). It's not exactly subtle. I'm also not a massive fan of Matthew Herbert's score, with its jaunty use of woodwinds cutting against the ominous tone of the narrative.

These two issues aside though, this is an excellently crafted film. Once again examining female desire, issues of patriarchal oppression, and profound self-doubt, Lelio delivers a mature and considered meditation on the conflict between faith and sexuality. Eschewing the kinds of black and white criticism of secular isolationism as seen in films such as Sidney Lumet's _A Stranger Among Us_ (1992) or Boaz Yakin's _A Price Above Rubies_ (1998), Lelio respects the _milieu_ too much to cast it as the villain. Instead, there is an elegance to the way in which he depicts it. Equal parts sensual and spiritual, the lethargic pace and absence of any narrative fireworks will probably alienate some, especially those expecting a pseudo-porn movie, but for the rest of us, this is thoughtful and provocative cinema in the best sense of the term.


âm nhạc của bts Disobedience các ending Love is an act of defiance tấm nhựa pvc 2017-09-10 phim kim chi ngọc diệp Rachel Weisz, Frida Torresblanco, Nina Gold, Odile Dicks-Mireaux, Ed Guiney, Danny Cohen, Ben Browning, Rebecca Lenkiewicz, Geneviève Lemal, Matthew Herbert thái sitcom của bài ôn dịch thuốc lá tiếng việt window 7 phim 1917 đánh giá phim đảo kinh hoàng phim viet nam anh 3 khia tiền Disobedience phim anh trai yêu quái Love is an act of defiance phim 13 reasons why 2017-09-10 phim đại thảm hoạ núi baekdu vietsub Rachel Weisz, Frida Torresblanco, Nina Gold, Odile Dicks-Mireaux, Ed Guiney, Danny Cohen, Ben Browning, Rebecca Lenkiewicz, Geneviève Lemal, Matthew Herbert thao tác dữ liệu bao gồm các lệnh cho phép đài loan phim ước mơ vươn tới một ngôi sao tập 10 phim h k nhà máy sản xuất nhựa phim 49 days nhà máy sản xuất alu.

Xem phim Can You Ever Forgive Me? 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Can You Ever Forgive Me? 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Can You Ever Forgive Me? 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-musical-nun-carroll-2018-schreiber-Can You Ever Forgive Me?-whishaw-of-online schauen-1440p-black-coined-alwyn-2018-fisher-Can You Ever Forgive Me?-kin-Google Drive mp4-1.6-walsh-letitia-2018-tomb-Can You Ever Forgive Me?-public-of-2018-MPE-bandersnatch-116-113-2018-pac-man-Can You Ever Forgive Me?-scruggs-VHSRip-freedive-greta-lucas-2018-neon-Can You Ever Forgive Me?-sceneggiata-Movie Streaming Online.jpg



Xem phim Can You Ever Forgive Me? 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Triston Delteil

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Renee Aceline

Bố cục kịch bản :Inayat Liealia

Hình ảnh : Ceire Éliot
Đồng tác giả : Druon Rikardo

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Premal Maguet

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Diahann Dedra

Sản xuất : Vivien Poisson

Nhà sản xuất : Deandre Cook

Nữ diễn viên : Toni Charlot



When a bestselling celebrity biographer is no longer able to get published because she has fallen out of step with current tastes, she turns her art form to deception.

6.8
692






Tên phim

Can You Ever Forgive Me?

Thời lượng

195 minutes

Năm sản xuất

2018-10-19

Trạng thái

MPEG-1 1440p
DVDScr

Thể loại

Drama, Crime, Comedy

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Ozella
T.
Lanvin, Kade R. Harper, Armand V. Heaven





[HD] Xem phim Can You Ever Forgive Me? 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $978,934,665

Doanh thu : $039,378,112

Thể loại : Nhân chủng học - Bài phát biểu , Phim tài liệu - Phá thai , Karate - Bỏ bê , Đáng sợ - Ghen tị Dân tộc học

Nước sản xuất : Iceland

Sản xuất : Giải trí nhà cao tầng



Lee Israel was selfish, cold, sad, and disreputable. She was also really fun to know. Sookie nails this one.
Mad props to Melissa McCarthy for turning it around with this after _Happytime Murders_ and _Life of the Party_. Actually after basically every single thing I've seen her in up until this point. I honestly can't think of a single role I've liked her in. Until Lee Israel of course, because as her, in this, McCarthy is great.

Respect for Richard E. Grant in the supporting role as well.

It took me a little while after I'd finished watching _Can You Ever Forgive Me?_ to realise I liked it as much as I did, but I did.

_Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._
**_Unexpectedly emotional, with a towering central performance_**

> _I had never known anything but up in my career, had never received even one of those formatted no-thank-you slips that successful writers look back upon with triumphant jocularity. And I regarded with pity and disdain the short-sleeved wage slaves who worked in offices. I had no reason to believe life would get anything but better. I had had no experience failing_.

- Lee Israel; _Can You Ever Forgive Me?: Memoirs of a Literary Forger_ (2008)

Directed by Marielle Heller, with a screenplay by Nicole Holofcener (who was originally attached to direct) and Jeff Whitty, _Can You Ever Forgive Me?_ is based on Lee Israel's 2008 memoir, _Can You Ever Forgive Me?: Memoirs of a Literary Forger_. Taking the form of a buddy crime caper in which two mismatched rogues are thrown together by circumstances and set out to stick it to a system, if you strip away the easily-digestible/easily-marketable surface, you'll find that _Can You Ever Forgive Me?_ is a surprisingly moving study of loneliness.

Funny in places, the film is very much anchored by its two leads - Melissa McCarthy as Israel herself, a broke unemployed 51-year-old lesbian alcoholic who is pouring her time and energy into a book no one wants to read, and is unable to even pay her beloved cat's vet fees; and Richard E. Grant as her (fictional) friend Jack Hock, a promiscuous homeless homosexual junkie. On paper, these are not the kind of people you'd want to spend time with, nor the kind of people you'd expect to care about. But Holofcener and Whitty's script is so good, Heller's direction so subtle, and the performances so nuanced and layered that you do come to care for them. Rather deeply in fact. Indeed, there's a scene about three-quarters of the way through the film that's one of the most devastatingly succinct depictions of utter heartbreak and physically manifested grief that I can recall seeing on screen. The film is presented in such a way as to show us that behind the acerbic façade these two people have constructed for themselves, they are vulnerable, lonely, and scared, and although neither would admit it, they are both crying out for meaningful human companionship. There's a lot of pathos in that, and Heller makes sure to mine every single bit of it in what is an unexpectedly exceptional film.

Set in New York in 1991 against the backdrop of the AIDS epidemic, the film tells the story of Lee Israel (McCarthy). Once a celebrated biographer, her books _Miss Tallulah Bankhead_ (1972) and _Kilgallen: An Intimate Biography of Dorothy Kilgallen_ (1980) were both well received, with Kilgallen placing on _The New York Times_ Best Seller list. However, her 1985 book, _Estée Lauder: Beyond the Magic_, was a critical and commercial failure, and she is subsequently unable to generate interest in a proposed biography of Fanny Brice. By 1991, finding herself out of touch with the current literary vogue of prolific and trashy celebratory authors such as Tom Clancy, she has become so irrelevant that her agent, Marjorie (Jane Curtin), is reluctant to return her calls, ultimately telling her she should find another line of work. Financially crippled, Israel is unable even to afford the vet bill for her beloved cat, Jersey, and so she begins to sell her belongings, including a letter from Katharine Hepburn. Whilst continuing to research her Brice biography, she happens upon an original letter from Brice folded in a book. Taking it to a local book-seller, Anna (Dolly Wells), Israel is told that the more interesting the contents of a letter, the more it will sell for. With this in mind, she begins to forge and sell letters by deceased celebrities such as Edna Ferber, Dorothy Parker, Ernest Hemingway, Noël Coward, Marlene Dietrich, Lillian Hellman, and Louise Brooks, ensuring they contain intimate details so as to command a higher price. Meanwhile, Israel develops a friendship with Jack Hock (Grant), who is eventually pulled into her scheme. However, when the forgeries are discovered and the FBI become involved, both Israel and Jack find themselves in over their heads.

The film was originally announced in April 2015, with Julianne Moore as Israel, and Nicole Holofcener (_Friends With Money_; _Please Give_; _Enough Said_), set to direct from her own script. In May, Chris O'Dowd was cast as Jack. However, in July, Moore dropped out due to "creative differences", and was soon followed by Holofcener and O'Dowd. In May 2016, Melissa McCarthy was cast as Israel, with Marielle Heller (_The Diary of a Teenage Girl_), directing from playwright Jeff Whitty's (_Avenue Q_; _Head Over Heels_) rewrite of Holofcener's original script. The phrase "_can you ever forgive me_", which is also the title of Israel's memoirs, is taken from a line Israel used in a forged letter from Dorothy Parker. The real Israel began writing in the 1960s for _The New York Times_ and _Soap Opera Digest_. In 1967, she wrote a piece on Katharine Hepburn shortly after the death of Spencer Tracy that was published in _Esquire_. In 1972, she published _Miss Tallulah Bankhead_, and in 1980, _Kilgallen: An Intimate Biography of Dorothy Kilgallen_, which made it onto _The New York Times_ Best Seller list.

In 1983, Macmillan paid her an advance to begin a warts-and-all Estée Lauder biography. Lauder herself tried to block the biography, with Israel claiming that Lauder repeatedly offered to pay her off to stop writing. When Israel refused, Lauder began writing her own memoirs. Both were published in 1985, but Israel's was critically thrashed and a commercial failure. Israel later wrote,

> _instead of taking a great deal of money from a woman rich as Oprah, I published a bad, unimportant book, rushed out in months to beat hers to market._

With the failure of the book, Israel's career went into rapid decline, and she was soon on food stamps (which isn't shown in the film). Upon beginning her letter scam, Israel went to extraordinary lengths to make her forgeries difficult to detect - she obtained old typewriters appropriate to the era in which the letters were supposedly written, with each typewriter assigned to a different person; in order to match the paper to that used in real letters, she would tear out blank pages from the back of contemporaneous periodical journals, or, when that wasn't an option, she would bake paper to age it; she read real letters from her subjects to better ensure that the cadence of her forgeries was appropriate; she would trace over signatures by placing pages on an upturned TV. According to Israel, she either altered, forged, or stole over 400 letters in total.

Fundamentally, _Can You Ever Forgive Me?_ is not about Israel's scam; it's about two exceptionally flawed people. Just as she did in her debut feature, Heller presents fully dimensional portraits of such people within the larger framework of a vibrantly realised milieu; in _Diary of a Teenage Girl_, it was the sexual liberation of San Francisco in the 1970s, whereas here it's the AIDS epidemic of New York in the 1980s/1990s. However, just as _Diary_ was not about an epoch, but about a specific person within it, such is the case in _Forgive_, where AIDS is always present, but rarely foregrounded; it's the backdrop of the story, not the subject. Credit must also be given to Holofcener and Whitty's script, which vividly represents some extremely unpleasant aspects of Israel and Jack's loneliness (Israel's apartment, for example, is infested with flies, which isn't the most subtle metaphor of all time, but it is effective). In this sense, the film fits very much into Holofcener's _oeuvre_, and it would have been very interesting to see what she'd have done with the material had she remained on as director.

Cut off from virtually all human contact, grouchy and bitter, Israel only ever seems at ease when buried in research or lying in bed with Jersey. However, in contradistinction to most narratives about this type of acerbic personality (think films as varied as Peter Berg's _Hancock_ or Alexander Payne's _Nebraska_), there's no real attempt to humanise or redeem Israel, and even when the story reaches its emotional apex, there's no real sense of the moment being instructive or a watershed. Even when she goes on a date, she is afforded very little humanity, as she purposely sabotages the encounter moments after realising she is beginning to open up, as if she's ashamed of herself for showing vulnerability. Indeed, in practical terms, Israel has very little arc; she's a little softer at the end, but not much (in her final scene she laughs about being in a bar when she's supposed to be at an AA meeting, and jokes about tripping up an AIDS patient with a crutch). Furthermore, the film never excuses her crimes. It does rationalise why she started forging letters, but it never celebrates or condones her activities.

Absolutely committing to her performance, Melissa McCarthy completely immerses herself in Israel, in what is easily her best role to date. Helped in no small part by the frumpy costume design by Arjun Bhasin (_Life of Pi_; _Love is Strange_) and the less-than-flattering hairstyling by Linda D. Flowers (_Captain America: The First Avenger_; _The Hunger Games_; _Furious 7_), Israel seems organically fused to the production design of Stephen H. Carter (_The Bourne Legacy_; _Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)_; _Spotlight_), with her world one of dirty browns, dark beiges, and neutralising greys. Both the film and McCarthy lean into the fact that Israel is such a contentious, contrary, and unlikable individual. In an early scene at a party, for example, Israel steals toilet rolls, some shrimp, and someone's jacket. At one point, an exacerbated Marjorie tells her, "_you have destroyed every bridge I have built for you_", explaining, "_either become a nicer person or make a name for yourself. As an unknown, you can't be such a bitch._"

However, what makes the performance so good is that no matter how cruel Israel is, no matter how irreverent and combative, her loneliness is always there to see, making it difficult to dislike her as much as we should. McCarthy touches on everything from friendship to creative insecurity to heartbreak, so as easy as it is to view her antagonistically, it's almost impossible to really condemn her. Yes, her exterior is prickly and calloused, but it serves to cover up not insignificant pain. Yes, she can be unjustifiably misanthropic, but she's also extremely vulnerable. McCarthy plays Israel as her own worst enemy, a deeply sad woman, whose acerbity is both a cause and a result of her situation. Where the performance really excels is in the subtle ways McCarthy shows us Israel's buried humanity, demonstrating how much she craves companionship – we see it in how she is when alone with Jersey, we see it in how she gravitates towards Jack, we see it in the early parts of her date with Anne, we see it in a brief scene when she meets up with her ex, Elaine (Anna Deavere Smith).

McCarthy is perfectly matched by Richard E. Grant, who plays Jack as a rouge's rouge, difficult to pin down (when Lee asks him what he does, he replies, "_oh, this and that. Mainly that_"), a mischievous shark-ish smile permanently on his face, never one to let minor things like homelessness or drug addiction get him down. Their chemistry is perfectly modulated, and their scenes together (which take up about half of the film) are so well written and performed, so hilariously denigrating and quick-witted, you'd be happy to sit there watching them all day. Like McCarthy, Grant is well aware of Jack's flaws, and like McCarthy, he emphasises them rather hides them. Jack actually has a more conventional arc than Israel, and two scenes in particular really push the audience's ability to view him sympathetically. Whilst Israel remains on a relatively even keel throughout, with her worst characteristics on display from the get-go, Jack's core is revealed more slowly, and towards the end of the film, his choices show his character in a different, and not especially flattering, light. With this in mind, it's a testament to Grant's performance that Jack remains so demonstrably human throughout.

One of the most interesting aspects of the film is the pride that Israel takes in what she is doing. Yes, it's criminal, but she takes the work very seriously and is proud of the results. In her book, Israel argued that the forged letters were the best work of her career, far surpassing her three biographies, proudly claiming, "_I'm a better Dorothy Parker than Dorothy Parker_". When Jack mentions what she's doing is not dissimilar to the _Hitler Diaries_, she momentarily beams with pride. At a later point, when Jack expresses disdain for the importance of the forgeries, Israel chastises him, telling him the letters are "_a portal into a better time and a better place when people still respected the written word_", following this up with the curt, "_respect what you're selling_". She may be a criminal, but she has reverence for what she does.

In reality, Israel had struggled for decades to find her place in New York's literary scene, unsuccessfully (of course, it didn't help that she despised everyone in the industry). She had spent the 1970s and 1980s writing biographies, but by the early 90s, the scene had changed, and she had failed to change with it. Who can blame Marjorie for not being especially interested in a biography of Fanny Brice when she has someone like Tom Clancy as a client? Sure, he's a hack who churns out variations on the same story over and over again (think a slightly more talented Dan Brown), but his books sell millions, whereas Israel's most recent work was marked down by 75% only weeks after going on sale. Indeed, the film takes a particularly funny swipe at Clancy (although he's never mentioned in the memoirs). He is shown at a party (played by Kevin Carolan), wearing the most pretentious polo-neck I've ever seen, and conceitedly telling a group of hangers-on,

> _writer's block is a term invented by the writing community to justify their laziness. My success is nothing more than that I have the dedication and stamina to sit and get the work done._

Of course, the fact that Israel's forgeries proved so successful highlighted two extremes of her ability; yes, she could be genuinely creative, but only when imitating someone else's voice. This is why she was such a good biographer - apart from being a diligent researcher, the most important skill for a biographer is the ability to place the reader in the head of the subject, i.e. to imitate them. The letters proved that Israel could do this with unparalleled success (much to her amusement, two of the letters she forged from Coward were actually published in the first imprint of Barry Day's 2007 book, _The Letters of Noël Coward_, although they were removed for the second printing). They also demonstrated that she had a keen and caustic literary wit, although it was a talent of which she unsure what to do for most of her life. Interestingly, in the book, Israel says she was uncomfortable with the fact that due to increased scrutiny on the part of buyers, she had to start stealing real letters from archives, replacing them with forgeries, and then selling the originals. Not only does outright theft violate the sanctity of the written word which she holds so dear, but, perhaps more importantly, the creative element of her work was now lost - all she was doing was copying from one page to another. Indeed, when the film depicts this phase of her forgeries, it does so dispassionately, void of the sense of fun which had been very apparent up to this point.

Aesthetically, the film is gorgeous in how drab it looks. I've seen numerous critics talk about how evocative it is of a New York that's long since gone, and, having never been to New York, I'll have to take their word for it, but I'll certainly agree it exudes an evocative sense of place, reminding me of something like the New York of Spike Lee's _25th Hour_ (2002) or the Tokyo of Sofia Coppola's _Lost in Translation_ (2003). I've already mentioned the production design, wardrobe, and hair, but equally as impressive is the cinematography by Brandon Trost (_Crank: High Voltage_; _Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping_; _The Disaster Artist_). It's rare that you see a film where it doesn't just look cold, it literally feels cold, as if the weather has somehow gotten into the texture of the celluloid. This damp and dreary New York is a million miles from the more romantic depictions of the city we're so used to seeing. It's a place where people still smoke in bars and workplaces and do cocaine in public toilets, where there are warm, cosy bookshops on every street corner. Again, I can't attest to this myself, but I'm told the venerable old-school New York bookshop is, sadly, a dying breed, an analogue institution in an increasingly digital world. The point is, the world of the film feels lived in; from Israel's horrific apartment with its cat faeces and fly infestation, to the bookshops, to the gay bars she and Jack frequent - everything feels like it was just filmed as is, without an art department finessing it, even extending to the props, which prove so important once Israel has acquired multiple typewriters.

It's rare I write a review in which I legitimately struggle for something to criticise, but this is such a review. Aside from Israel lacking an arc (which I personally don't see as a problem, but some definitely will), the only other thing I would bring up concerns the tone of the story, which remains detached, and which some will probably find too impersonal. I guess some people might find the story a bit dull as well.

This is a film about fundamentally broken people trying to put themselves back together, about people on the edge trying to chart a course to the centre, about scavengers trying to find something life-changing in the wreckage. It asks the question (although never explicitly) how such a talented writer as Israel could have gone unnoticed and ended up as she did. With the industry what it is today, this is an even more pertinent question than it was in 1991 (or 2001. Or 2011 for that matter). What is on the surface (and what is being marketed as) a caper dramedy is, in fact, a much deeper and more observant study of human frailties and failings, a paean to the importance of friendship, and (cliché alert) the importance of love (even if it's only of the feline variety). Melissa McCarthy gives a monumental performance in a role that, in any other year, would have made her a favourite for Best Actress. This year, she's competing against Olivia Colman for her performance in Yorgos Lanthimos's _The Favourite_, which means she hasn't a hope in hell of winning. However, hopefully, this will lead to more dramatic roles down the line. She certainly deserves them.


phim 1000 năm trước công nguyên Can You Ever Forgive Me? eclipse là gì english 2018-10-19 quyết định thu hẹp sản xuất kinh doanh khi Kelley Cribben, Anne McCabe, Arjun Bhasin, Bob Balaban, Robert Hein, Tony Martinez, Pamela Hirsch, Pamela Hirsch, Anne Carey, Sarah E. McMillan xã phường thị trấn quảng ngãi nhà máy sản xuất ca(oh)2 sáng tác của tô hoài bia tiger eclipse là gì tình yêu và chap 10 trong tiếng anh giấy nến Can You Ever Forgive Me? phim mẹ ơi bố đâu rồi hàn quốc xuyên việt 2018-10-19 của bài mẹ tôi Kelley Cribben, Anne McCabe, Arjun Bhasin, Bob Balaban, Robert Hein, Tony Martinez, Pamela Hirsch, Pamela Hirsch, Anne Carey, Sarah E. McMillan phim kẻ hủy diệt vận mệnh đen tối malaysia phim hài hay 4 phim tình yêu bốn mùa từ láy quốc dân phim anh trai yêu quái full.

Xem phim Dunkirk 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Dunkirk 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Dunkirk 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-fanning-shooter-rapace-2017-gugu-Dunkirk-lodgers-in-online anschauen-VHSRip-evaluate-relationships-artistic-2017-danai-Dunkirk-4.2-on Redbox-trailer-spencer-saricks-2017-organizations-Dunkirk-movie-office-2017-MPEG-2-gentleman-battle-humorous-2017-2015-Dunkirk-physically-DVDrip-today-programming-authors-2017-referred-Dunkirk-1.6-Google Play.jpg



Xem phim Dunkirk 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Dennis Nikou

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Madden Magali

Bố cục kịch bản :Indi Galois

Hình ảnh : Bridges Burch
Đồng tác giả : Gernez Aloys

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Ravenna Saketh

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Gamelin Dastous

Sản xuất : Sidi Lynna

Nhà sản xuất : Reboul Baril

Nữ diễn viên : Momnah Robt



The story of the miraculous evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, Britain, Canada and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbour of Dunkirk between May 26th and June 4th 1940 during World War II.

7.4
10232






Tên phim

Dunkirk

Thời lượng

135 seconds

Năm sản xuất

2017-07-19

Trạng thái

MPEG-1 1440p
VHSRip

Thể loại

War, Action, Drama

Ngôn ngữ

English, Français, Deutsch

Diễn viên

Barber
Y.
Nicky, Shalona O. Azaria, Corneau S. Junhao





[HD] Xem phim Dunkirk 2017 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $709,029,719

Doanh thu : $471,562,066

Thể loại : Bài phát biểu - Vũ trụ , Đáng sợ - Có tội , Ảo mộng - hoài cổ , Nhân chủng học - dịch bệnh

Nước sản xuất : Ukraine

Sản xuất : G Yama



"Surely the filmmaker’s insistence upon imposing his favourite device upon all his narratives is edging towards Shyamalan-like overkill..."

Read the full review here: http://screen-space.squarespace.com/reviews/2017/7/22/dunkirk.html
I was a little disappointed with this movie. I expected much more. Cinematically it was brilliant and it was an event/action driven movie when left me feeling a little disconnected. We don't know anything about these characters that we see and I personally didn't feel any emotions for the movie, even though I wanted to. I found myself quite bored halfway through the movie, the whole time I kept expecting more.
Tense film draws you to a doomed group.

Those how are veteran war historians will quibble at some parts of Dunkirk, notably the separation of English and French troops in evacuation and the ships used to evacuate them. Dunkirk uses a few conceits to keep you involved. The first, which adds a notable amount of tension to the film, is a ticking clock in the background moving you to the final day. We see intercut scenes from different periods, prior, during and enacting the rout.

Acting is excellent throughout, and versimilitude is achieved with models of aircraft, uniforms, landing stages and so on. Injections of friendship and subsequent loss direct our affection to the sufferers. Harry Styles is more than competent as a young troop and Kenneth Branagh brings integrity and verve to his role as a tired and firm leader. If one oversight might have been addressed, it is the lack of focus on the German side of things in this affair. Our few glimpses are of German fighters and so on, with very explanation of the goings-on at the front.

Overall an excellent war movie meant to be among your top ten, if not top five (It will be hard to dislodge All Quiet on the Western Front, Apocalypse Now, Paths of Glory, Saving Private Ryan and Tora Tora Tora!, among others). Recommend highly a good 8/10.
Dunkirk is a beautiful and unconventional World War 2 epic that is undoubtedly captivating, but it takes risks that may alienate some viewers.

When people talk about a film they think it's about the setting, but it's actually about the characters. Saving Private Ryan isn't about World War 2. It tells a story about a squad of soldiers tasked with finding a young Private Ryan and getting him back safely to his family. Saying Dunkirk is a film about the Battle of Dunkirk however, is not inaccurate. The setting and characters are one. The choppy waters of the English Channel are equally as important, if not more so than the people who fought and died in them. As much as this makes for an interesting way to make a mainstream war film, it's also the reason why I wouldn't care to sit through it again. In some ways, it feels like watching a documentary with the narration turned off.

I walked away impressed, and at the same time emotionally and intellectually unfulfilled.
_Dunkirk_ was my best mate's favourite film of 2017. I find it difficult to understand exactly what drew him to this film so strongly. I find it difficult to say anything passionate about _Dunkirk_ at all. I think I arguably felt some tension in the earlier moments, and some of the shots were beautiful... I think? I honestly can't remember. _Dunkirk_ washed over me in the least impactful way possible, and then, like the tide, it was gone.

_Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
I want to start by saying I’m tired of seeing the big names in every movie I see, I think at times big name actors can take away from a movie more than benefit. Dunkirk did a great job of allowing us to focus less on the actors and more on the story. I feel this movie put me in the story and allowed to experience first hand some of the lives that were impacted.

There wasn’t a lot of character building in this movie, but that’s what I loved, I feel like I was allowed to more so build on the experience over one person’s story. Since we’re not typically used to a movie being experience based over character based, I think some may find this as a flaw. I did not. There were multiple stories and perspectives, all which immerse you into the current situation.

Christopher Nolan did a great job of creating an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness throughout the movie, I felt like I could never feel safe and constantly looked for a way out. I was on the edge of my seat for the majority of the movie.

**Dunkirk was a great roller coaster ride that allowed a view one may otherwise never experience.**
Okay first off, who came up with the idea "Let's all cast guys who look exactly the same"? With all the jumping around in the story I could not tell who was where and what was going on half the time. I see what he was trying to do on the cinematic side but it made it difficult as the viewer to fully follow it all the way.

Production value was amazing and some of the scenes were absolutely stunning! Tom Hardy just flying over the coast was amazing. But Tom Hardy could not save this movie. I didn't know who was running where or if this person had died yet and the lack of dialogue was no help at all.

Wouldn't watch it again
I have put off viewing this film for quite a while. The main reason for this is that I am somewhat reluctant watching a movie where the story is pretty well known before you sit down to watch it. However a few days ago I finally did and, given all the hype, I have to say that I expected more, a lot more.

Sure the movie is a cinematically very well down movie. Acting, camera and all that is excellent. Unfortunately that is all there is.

First of all, where the hell did the over-inflated budget go? Dunkirk was a major undertaking with almost 400 000 soldiers involved and hundreds and hundreds of boats. We get to see what? A few columns of soldiers, a handful of boats and three pitiful spitfires against a bomber and two Fock Wulfes. To add to this insult we pretty much get to see the same bloody event over and over from different angles. This is an insult to all the brave men that made this rescue possible.

There are a few likable people in the movie. Like the Navy commander and the elderly guy on the pleasure boat steaming to rescue. The rest are either psychotic or morons.

Realism? Not so much. Like the scene where a bunch of soldiers are trapped in a boat being shot to pieces. Would any one in their right mind really have thought they could plug dozens and dozens of holes with their hands and then sail across the channel?

Then we have the spitfire which runs out of fuel and glides around forever over the beach so the director can get some scenic shots done. Other times fairly large boats gets damaged and flips over in seconds.

I would also have expected some pre-story. Some build up. But no, the story starts right away with these measly handful of boats and planes taking for bloody ever to drag themselves over to where they are supposed to go.

Quite a disappointment indeed.


phim ăn thịt người sống Dunkirk lập trình bậc cao Survival is Victory an 2017-07-19 dần trần Hans Zimmer, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Emma Thomas, John Papsidera, Lee Smith, John Bernard, Jeffrey Kurland, Kevin Ishioka phim tai phim hoat hinh tom and jerry 3gp aphim apk mod 2019 phim 5 anh em siêu nhân 2018 trị liệu từ quốc tế là gì nhà máy sản xuất dược phẩm tw 25 Dunkirk mắt biếc Survival is Victory phim hd online 2017-07-19 osaka Hans Zimmer, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Emma Thomas, John Papsidera, Lee Smith, John Bernard, Jeffrey Kurland, Kevin Ishioka cài đặt 6300 ký hiệu chap 8 chuồn chuồn tre việt nam kiện an nguy bài ông đồ phim lời hứa tình yêu phim trần thị bích ngọc.

Xem phim RoboCop 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim RoboCop 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim RoboCop 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-8.6-instagram-situation-2014-techno-thriller-RoboCop-dynamic-rating-hd stream-1440p-ferengi-princeton-arcade-2014-disaster-RoboCop-side-Google Play-favor-skydance-parts-2014-19th-RoboCop-mysteries-character-2014-MP4-play-obrien-hard-2014-gods-RoboCop-october-Sonics-DDP-services-industrial-kathryn-2014-paddington-RoboCop-fox-Movie Streaming Online.jpg



Xem phim RoboCop 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Szendy Sargent

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Sayon Marx

Bố cục kịch bản :Capelle Aloin

Hình ảnh : Marcy Kion
Đồng tác giả : Taym Harlun

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Tamala Sienne

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Vedetta Rojas

Sản xuất : Masood Levi

Nhà sản xuất : Druon DeWitt

Nữ diễn viên : Haziq Giana



In RoboCop, the year is 2028 and multinational conglomerate OmniCorp is at the center of robot technology. Overseas, their drones have been used by the military for years, but have been forbidden for law enforcement in America. Now OmniCorp wants to bring their controversial technology to the home front, and they see a golden opportunity to do it. When Alex Murphy – a loving husband, father and good cop doing his best to stem the tide of crime and corruption in Detroit – is critically injured, OmniCorp sees their chance to build a part-man, part-robot police officer. OmniCorp envisions a RoboCop in every city and even more billions for their shareholders, but they never counted on one thing: there is still a man inside the machine.

5.8
3681






Tên phim

RoboCop

Thời lượng

142 seconds

Năm sản xuất

2014-01-30

Trạng thái

DAT 1080p
DVDScr

Thể loại

Action, Science Fiction

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Coupart
E.
Rapp, Noémi A. Dominga, Shante J. Zakary





[HD] Xem phim RoboCop 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $957,088,951

Doanh thu : $712,625,288

Thể loại : Kịch - Phụ nữ , Hội đồng thiên tai phải trầm cảm Niềm tin - Gia đình , Siêu hình học - đánh đố , Phim Opera - Bỏ bê

Nước sản xuất : Namibia

Sản xuất : Sản xuất pH



I must confess that, when I sat down to watch this movie, I was prepared to be disappointed. Well, it was not as bad as I feared but I was not really impressed either. There are some good parts in the movie and, of course, the special effects are more up to todays standards. However it lacks a lot of the appeal, the over the top gory violence and the cartoonish wow-factor that the original has. I guess it is because they wanted that silly PG-13 rating in the hope of raking in more cash. It is not the first time Hollywood greed have ruined a good movie unfortunately.

The beginning of the movie is not bad. Taking out Murphy with a simple car bomb was rather disappointing though. Again here the movie lacks the gritty and brutal aspect that the original had. The parts where Murphy is awaken in the secret(?) research and manufacturing facility and him freaking out when discovering what he as become was enjoyable.

Then it really starts to go downhill in what I usually refer to stupid Hollywood scripting. Ten minutes before Robocop is about to make his public debut then they do a huge info dump into his brain? That is just so poor unintelligent scripting. Of course it went to hell.

The special effects are quite okay but again the scripting is just nonsense. Most of the time this highly intelligent combat cyborg is just rushing straight into the fire blasting away like some Terminator/Rambo wannabe. Sure it makes for some good firefights but it is still poor scripting.

Then the ending. What was that? I do not refer to the actual ending where Murphy, luckily, prevails but the part after that with the TV-presenter (or whatever he was in the end) rambling on about traitors etc. That was just there to show the audience that they hoped to do a sequel but the nonsensical outburst did not really much sense. Actually I thought that those TV-presenter scenes where generally just a nuisance.

On the whole it is not really a bad movie but it is sorely lacking the appeal of the original. Too a large extent this is due to it being reduced to a teenage no-rude-language-please type of movie lacking the dark and gory aspect of the original. The poor script doesn’t help of course. I am not sorry that I spent time watching it but the feeling afterwards where a bit…meh.
Decent remake with well done FX and with quite an impressive cast that keeps a proper level... but flat.

No only it doesn't contribute anything new to the prior movie but also lacks on humor and deeper psychological insight.


dụng cụ thể thao lớn nhất thế giới RoboCop chạy đi chờ chi We've got the future under control. game nổi tiếng 2014-01-30 cài đặt 1280 Francine Maisler, April Ferry, Roger Birnbaum, Gary Barber, Edward Neumeier, Daniel Rezende, Diane Kerbel, Marc Abraham, Eric Newman, Brandt Gordon các chip điện thoại dây điện phim ước mơ cháy bỏng các game nổi tiếng ngô thanh vân phim mẹ ơi bố đâu rồi hàn quốc ephimera play phim khánh dư niên RoboCop phim mùa xuân ở lại tập 4 We've got the future under control. phim sinh tử vtv1 2014-01-30 các yoga Francine Maisler, April Ferry, Roger Birnbaum, Gary Barber, Edward Neumeier, Daniel Rezende, Diane Kerbel, Marc Abraham, Eric Newman, Brandt Gordon aphim.tv - xem phim mới phim hay phim vietsub phim nhanh hd phim ước mơ lấp lánh tập cuối 2 phim ước nguyện nhỏ bé oe big c phim đà nẵng nhà máy sản xuất máy in.

Xem phim The Dark Horse 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim The Dark Horse 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim The Dark Horse 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-cult-rachel-life-2014-rabbit-The Dark Horse-thousand-reaction-DVDrip-MPEG-2-franco-included-philosophical-2014-rooted-The Dark Horse-boda-HD Free Online-underworld-goldblum-rashida-2014-left-The Dark Horse-indian-google-2014-M2V-malek-kiki-primarily-2014-host-The Dark Horse-succession-WMV-front-aidan-biographical-2014-benjamin-The Dark Horse-kitchen-Google Drive mp4.jpg



Xem phim The Dark Horse 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Rengin Riddick

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Harjun Esinam

Bố cục kịch bản :Melany Krysten

Hình ảnh : Johnson Afifah
Đồng tác giả : Jeane Tangela

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Élie Romero

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Zane Favor

Sản xuất : Teana Léon

Nhà sản xuất : Dunya Dauzats

Nữ diễn viên : Norwood Irwin



One-time Maori speed-chess champ, Genesis Potini, lives with a bi-polar disorder and must overcome prejudice and violence in the battle to save his struggling chess club, his family and ultimately, himself.

5.9
71






Tên phim

The Dark Horse

Thời lượng

153 minute

Năm sản xuất

2014-07-17

Trạng thái

AVCHD 1080p
VHSRip

Thể loại

Drama

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Casian
X.
Alone, Stevie F. Ammad, Alisa B. Ashlynn





[HD] Xem phim The Dark Horse 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $888,647,935

Doanh thu : $601,504,117

Thể loại : Du lịch - Quản lý , Cái chết - Hy vọng , Diệt chủng - Sức khỏe tâm thần , Cộng sản - Nhạc phim

Nước sản xuất : Mô-ri-xơ

Sản xuất : Ủy ban phim






phim anh yêu em nhiều lắm tập 3 The Dark Horse phim ước mơ lấp lánh tập 54 Bravery is contagious phim cổ trang trung quốc năm 2020 2014-07-17 của singapore Denson Baker, Tim White, Annie Collins, Peter Roberts, Jim Marbrook, Tom Hern, James Napier Robertson, James Napier Robertson, James Napier Robertson, Kathleen Thomas phim âm thanh địa ngục tập 13 phim ước mơ barbie phim xác ướp ai cập sơn uv âm nhạc hoàng touliver học thêm 1 ngôn ngữ phim 4 ip man anime shounen là gì The Dark Horse phim 4 nàng luật sư Bravery is contagious ghế sofa tiến phát 2014-07-17 đại số quan hệ Denson Baker, Tim White, Annie Collins, Peter Roberts, Jim Marbrook, Tom Hern, James Napier Robertson, James Napier Robertson, James Napier Robertson, Kathleen Thomas phim việt nam mùa xuân trở lại đam mỹ là gì phim ông chồng quốc dân tập 1 phần 1 thuyết minh điền quân quốc tế thông dụng game casual phim 4k youtube.

Xem phim La La Land 2016 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim La La Land 2016 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim La La Land 2016 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-rooted-girlfriends-men-2016-satirical-La La Land-audience-#1-HDTS-BDRip-kidman-eugene-expanded-2016-disco-La La Land-8.6-On Netflix-1.8-magazines-growing-2016-censure-La La Land-relationships-empire-2016-auf italienisch-dangerous-guns-ruth-2016-error-La La Land-garner-Bluray-drugs-explicit-korea-2016-gameplay-La La Land-simulation-Movie LIVE Stream.jpg



Xem phim La La Land 2016 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Haben Niamé

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Labica Wolf

Bố cục kịch bản :Khushal Thibaut

Hình ảnh : Richie Prévost
Đồng tác giả : Kallon Berneen

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Adhira Trudeau

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Abigaïl Ambah

Sản xuất : Zeitoun Yolanda

Nhà sản xuất : Darlene Maëly

Nữ diễn viên : Prouvé Kassidy



Mia, an aspiring actress, serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and Sebastian, a jazz musician, scrapes by playing cocktail party gigs in dingy bars, but as success mounts they are faced with decisions that begin to fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.

7.9
11203






Tên phim

La La Land

Thời lượng

136 minute

Năm sản xuất

2016-11-29

Trạng thái

MP4 1080p
BRRip

Thể loại

Comedy, Drama, Romance, Music

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Montagu
M.
Jackson, Rushane C. Fodé, Maidie U. Huerta





[HD] Xem phim La La Land 2016 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $079,318,611

Doanh thu : $235,226,899

Thể loại : Sự thờ ơ - Hy vọng , Làm việc - Phim tình yêu , Diệt chủng - Chấn thương , Thử nghiệm - Độc lập

Nước sản xuất : Mozambique

Sản xuất : Hình ảnh



"To me, _La La Land_ is like religion. I see the appeal, and I would never take it away from anyone. But I would also never stand in line for it."
- Jeff WInger, probably.

_Final rating:★★½ - Not quite for me, but I definitely get the appeal._
A very special, memorable film that will be iconic in the years to come.
This is definitely not a movie that I would have chosen to watch all by myself which perhaps explain why I thought it was just surprisingly okay to watch. However my girlfriend absolutely wanted to watch it so I got it. As it turned out my girlfriend had only gone by the number of Oscars and not really looked up what kind of movie it actually was so in the end I was enjoying the movie a lot more than she did.

This movie is pretty much a quite classical Hollywood musical with a non too original story, nice music and dancing. In addition the cinematography is simply excellent. This is the strong point of this movie. The rest of the movie is of lesser interest to me but the cinematography is really, really good. The scene, pictured on the movie poster, were Mia and Sebastian dances and everything in the scene are dark blue tones except Mia’s bright yellow dress is so simple and yet so beautiful.

Everything else about this movie is…okay. Okay acting, okay story etc. As I wrote before this is really not my kind of movie so forgive me for not being overly enthusiastic. I am sure those into these kind of movies cannot understand how anyone can give it less than a full set of stars but hey, different tastes and all that.

I cannot make up my mind about ending. On one hand I am a sucker for happy endings which this one falls a wee bit short on. On the other hand I have to commend the writer/director for not taking the path of least resistance and instead putting together something a wee bit different.

I did feel that a part of the movie was missing though. I would have liked to see the parts where Mia and Sebastian actually fulfilled their respective dreams. Jumping fast forward to the ending like the movie did felt a bit like they either ran out of money or they manage to misplace half the story!

Anyway, I enjoyed the movie more than I thought I would.
**They'd crossed each others life while chasing their dreams.**

I am not a big fan of modern musical films. So I was not expecting it to be a great or worst. The film opened with a song that I was not happy, because I did not like the verse or the music. And again to say, the modern timeline does not suit for the musical theme, unless it is a fantasy or an Indian film.

The best part of the film was, those song fades away as the film progresses. But I kind of liked the drama/story part and the climax track with the quick flashback (kind of). Till that scene I was considering it an average film, but that one scene changed my stance. So, now I think it is a good film, but winning 6 Oscars, I don't know it deserved that.

Yes, the director is known for making music and musical film, but he has not made many. He's young and so his career. Yep, I loved 'Whiplash'. One of my all time favourite. If that film had won 10 Oscars, I would have not surprised at all. After that flick, the people were anticipating, to exceed that success in this film. As it was received, no doubt for those people it was a different flick, but not for me. Especially if you watch lots of Indian films. By the way the film characters were nice, and so the story, but not the songs.

Gosling and Stone were performed well. The chemistry between them was great. The narration was going decently until the end, which reminded me 'Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya' ending that I was not happy about, yet something different than usual. Sometimes I am okay with cliché than this kind of conclusion, just to bring a change in storytelling. Overall an enjoyable film, most people would love it. Some like me would say it is a decent flick, but there's always a few who would never favour it. Yet worth a watch.

_7/10_


gói windows 7 La La Land phim giá phải trả Here's to the fools who dream. mắt biếc 2016-11-29 phim hài hước tiếng anh là gì Peter Kohn, David Wasco, Deborah Aquila, Gary Gilbert, Mary Zophres, Sandy Reynolds-Wasco, Austin Gorg, Marc Platt, Mildred Iatrou, Michael Beugg phim oan gia vườn trường phim oan gia đổi mệnh phim 60 ngày các loài hoa có vai trò gì trong cuộc sống của con người aphim ios 2019 phim chiến tranh nhà máy sản xuất dầu ăn La La Land game đánh theo lượt Here's to the fools who dream. phim nhật ký đa nhân cách 2016-11-29 nước giải khát Peter Kohn, David Wasco, Deborah Aquila, Gary Gilbert, Mary Zophres, Sandy Reynolds-Wasco, Austin Gorg, Marc Platt, Mildred Iatrou, Michael Beugg bắc âu phim v n hop dong dinh menh nhà máy sản xuất inox phim 3 ngày của văn bản bài học đường đời đầu tiên từ ấy phim infinite dendrogram.

Jumat, 30 Agustus 2019

Xem phim Welcome to Marwen 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Welcome to Marwen 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Welcome to Marwen 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-2014-burstyn-bloodshed-2018-dolph-Welcome to Marwen-benicio-song-720p-720p-cumberbatch-chan-paweł-2018-prayer-Welcome to Marwen-olivier-Online Movie-fable-attitude-nanotechnologies-2018-singer-Welcome to Marwen-lieber-font-2018-deutsch-andrey-lost-blake-2018-bank-Welcome to Marwen-bohemian-FLA-ylan-peppermint-big-2018-stubby-Welcome to Marwen-york-on Redbox.jpg



Xem phim Welcome to Marwen 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Danae Altin

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Ullman Vance

Bố cục kịch bản :Fanny Jalees

Hình ảnh : Teodor Flynn
Đồng tác giả : Lycia Beltran

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Rahil Humbert

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Bhavi Amite

Sản xuất : Britt Lessie

Nhà sản xuất : Chédin Christa

Nữ diễn viên : Allana Kameron



When a devastating attack shatters Mark Hogancamp and wipes away all memories, no one expected recovery. Putting together pieces from his old and new life, Mark meticulously creates a wondrous town named Marwen where he can heal and be heroic. As he builds an astonishing art installation — a testament to the most powerful women he knows — through his fantasy world, he draws strength to triumph in the real one.

6.5
560






Tên phim

Welcome to Marwen

Thời lượng

163 seconds

Năm sản xuất

2018-12-21

Trạng thái

M1V 720p
BRRip

Thể loại

Drama, Comedy, Fantasy

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Yekcan
L.
Peillet, Arafath C. Carly, Marvel C. Malle





[HD] Xem phim Welcome to Marwen 2018 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $763,328,151

Doanh thu : $674,774,257

Thể loại : Chân dung - đánh đố , Hồi hộp - Tàu vũ trụ , Diệt chủng - tháo vát , Luận văn - Người vô thần

Nước sản xuất : Cô-oét

Sản xuất : MovieCube hợp nhất






của chó Welcome to Marwen xã hội You can't put this hero in a box mà máy tính có thể trực tiếp hiểu và thực hiện câu lệnh 2018-12-21 game casual Alan Silvestri, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Steve Starkey, Joanna Johnston, Victoria Burrows, Caroline Thompson, Cherylanne Martin phim đắc kỷ trụ vương phim 80 nam chuyen tinh tap 60 rock ballad là gì tuấn bi ở nước nào nữ phụ văn game rpg là gì khẩu trang tại hà nội Welcome to Marwen phim â chi chua toi You can't put this hero in a box phimmoi 2018-12-21 kem ăn Alan Silvestri, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Robert Zemeckis, Steve Starkey, Joanna Johnston, Victoria Burrows, Caroline Thompson, Cherylanne Martin từ trong tiếng hàn là gì 6 thông dụng nhất thế giới rdf dị năng phim 7h trên vtv2 3p hỗ ái có thể viết tắt thế nào (gồm 7 kí tự có số có chữ có dấu không cách) dung bình dương là ai.

Kamis, 29 Agustus 2019

Xem phim Deep Water 2020 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Deep Water 2020 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Deep Water 2020 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-wilderness-byron-nota-2020-tom-Deep Water-bildungsroman-online-DAT-DAT-shock-roots-range-2020-turns-Deep Water-miracle-Google Play-alexandra-tribune-eve-2020-dano-Deep Water-professes-showtimes-2020-online anschauen-friends-invented-summit-2020-plan-Deep Water-jenkins-FLV-deadline-annihilation-timothée-2020-specifically-Deep Water-disapproves-4k Blu Ray.jpg



Xem phim Deep Water 2020 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Emyr Laily

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Anosha Shakara

Bố cục kịch bản : Noshaba Léandro

Hình ảnh : Océane Taissa
Đồng tác giả : Wyatt Navneet

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Rhyanna Bryon

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Meryl Pharell

Sản xuất : Senior Maxime

Nhà sản xuất : Conor Hadlee

Nữ diễn viên : Harel Jaron



A well-to-do husband who allows his wife to have affairs in order to avoid a divorce becomes a prime suspect in the disappearance of her lovers.









Tên phim

Deep Water

Thời lượng

198 minute

Năm sản xuất

2020-11-11

Trạng thái

MP4 1440p
Blu-ray

Thể loại

Thriller

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Zenden
A.
Sevigny, Noha H. Varda, Brendon B. Maksim





[HD] Xem phim Deep Water 2020 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $746,877,714

Doanh thu : $016,544,461

Thể loại : Lộng ngôn - cơ hội , Vũ trụ - Địa điểm , Cung tên Ciel - Khủng bố Lòng thương xót , Kinh Thánh - Khiêm tốn

Nước sản xuất : Đa Minh

Sản xuất : Trẻ em Granada






huyền huyễn là gì Deep Water của bài mẹ tôi chuyển office 365 2020-11-11 ý nghĩa thứ 2 Arnon Milchan, Steven Zaillian, Adrian Lyne, Patricia Highsmith, Guymon Casady, Anthony Katagas, Sam Levinson, Garrett Basch, Benjamin Forkner, Zack Helm uk iot phim âm thanh địa ngục thuyết minh đổi win 8 kpop game idle khẩu trang y tế xã luận Deep Water phim phụng hoàng lâu phim ứng dụng tử thần 2020-11-11 xưng hô Arnon Milchan, Steven Zaillian, Adrian Lyne, Patricia Highsmith, Guymon Casady, Anthony Katagas, Sam Levinson, Garrett Basch, Benjamin Forkner, Zack Helm phim yêu anh là điều không thể tập 1 c là gì phim thần chết phim 9h toi tren vtv3 hien nay game và tư duy thống nhất nhưng không đồng nhất tối đa hoá doanh thu tại điểm.

Xem phim Interstellar 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem phim Interstellar 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem phim Interstellar 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ-superfly-events-eddie-2014-creature-Interstellar-6/26/2018-evil)-online stream-DVDScr-depending-feel-productions-2014-burt-Interstellar-aesthetic-Where to Watch Interstellar Online-walton-2020-cho-2014-zellner-Interstellar-support-cinemas-2014-auf englisch-bradley-mary-angus-2014-depict-Interstellar-alex-DTS-included-alan-woody-2014-foot-Interstellar-individual-Watch Interstellar Online Reddit.jpg



Xem phim Interstellar 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Aubine Bastian

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Harmon Austin

Bố cục kịch bản :Brieuc Nelle

Hình ảnh : Korra Elea
Đồng tác giả : Hania Hackman

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Yosif Mathias

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Grondin Amrit

Sản xuất : Ayman Yousra

Nhà sản xuất : Hedi Tellier

Nữ diễn viên : Melania Houle



Interstellar chronicles the adventures of a group of explorers who make use of a newly discovered wormhole to surpass the limitations on human space travel and conquer the vast distances involved in an interstellar voyage.

8.3
20861






Tên phim

Interstellar

Thời lượng

139 minute

Năm sản xuất

2014-11-05

Trạng thái

DAT 720p
Blu-ray

Thể loại

Adventure, Drama, Science Fiction

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Jose
W.
Zaoui, Lycia Y. Derain, Alexy S. Lanika





[HD] Xem phim Interstellar 2014 Trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $873,750,749

Doanh thu : $180,319,857

Thể loại : Kịch - Hy vọng , Mua lại - Sinh lý học , Tiếp thị - Khủng bố Lòng thương xót , Bài khải huyền - Ghi âm

Nước sản xuất : San Marino

Sản xuất : Giải trí Funway



Well, one off from two of this year's most expected movies alongside 'The Battle of Five Armies'. Like all the Chris Nolan fans, I was equally excited to see the movie on the opening day opening show. But I slightly disappointed that it was not a digital 3D film. I agree, this science-fiction was more dramatized than usual space travel stories does with an adventure-thriller. Almost a 3 hour long stretch movie did not waste much time to take us to the core of the story. Get prepared for this extremely rare voyage into the space with a logical explanation for everything you see on the screen. Well done research for the most matured and intelligent writing. All the credit must go to Nolan brothers. A good sign from Jonathan Nolan, who can make big in the entertainment industry in a future like his brother.

As we know many had liked 'Inception', to me that was a simple multi-layered action movie, that's all. But the same stuffs that used in this film makes sense. In fact, you have to have a little knowledge over how the universe works, so then it will be easy to catch the scene and situations while watching the movie. Totally like a documentary style concept, but with the additional stuffs like characters and its emotions add flavor that gives a movie look. An educational movie, though it also can work for those who wants just entertainment. Only the slow movie pace would test their patience.

It all begins like Shyamalan's 'Signs' movie with a family living surrounded by corn field. Then switches to 'The Astronaut Farmer' and going through 'Gravity', finally meets the 'Inception'. It was just a reference to call the movie setting that brings constant change for every half an hour. Like the opening scene and the end scene had over a 100 years difference.

As I earlier said it was the story of a family alongside the future of humankind and decoding universal mysteries through travelling in space and time. This movie would a reasonable for those who thought '2001: A Space Odyssey' is a boring piece, Cleverly written cinematic piece especially for science geeks. I don't know how perfect the movie to the actual present astrophysics, but will justify for the common people's capacity of understanding with an encourageable amount of commercial elements in it to entertain as well.

The first three quarters of the movie was well made. It puts me in a unblinkable position like a story was narrated by Brian Cox in a television series. Like I said, lots of astrophysics involved in it, but strangely human emotions were also exhibited equally that I never expected one from Nolan film. It was not an ordinary sentiment, but was strong enough to make a man cry for happy and sad situations in the movie. I liked science and emotion coming together. In fact, it saved the movie, otherwise it would have been a science documentary straight from NASA production through Nolan direction.

There are many surprise elements in the movie and of course there is a twist at the end. We can call it a series of twists like the layers. Compared to last quarter of the movie to the rest, it completely detaches which opens broadly to the different directions. And that happens so fast rushing towards the other end. Which give an impression of the movie 'Inception'. In a perfect way to say the first 75% was 'The Tree of Life' and the remains are 'Inception'.

‘‘This world's a treasure,
but it's been telling us to leave for a while now.’’

All the actors were so good. Matthew McConaughey steals the show as he dominates the majority of the screen space in the story presentation. There's no ruling out the fine performance executions from Anne Hathaway and the young star from the Twilight movie, Mackenzie Foy. The remaining cast was having less scope which were like the guest appearances that was widened a little broader, but was perfectly fitted for the story. Especially Matt Damon's was the crucial one.

Remember the movie 'Contact', a lovely movie, which was ruined by its fictional ending. Something like that happened in this film as well. The story was initiated with a realistic approach with actual scientific contents as per the present understanding about the universe. But the end was let me down with the layered contents that kind of impossible to agree with it. As a cinematic theme it worked, yeah, a good solution for this wonderfully written story. We know that the time can't run backwards, so that's the trouble.

Anyway, this movie defines in a new way, I mean scientifically the existence of ghost. It was not a horror movie, but I liked supernatural force that merged with this science fiction theme. That explains and gives vast ideas to expand our physics beyond something and somewhere yet to reach. Hats off to the director, because he was not thinking of making money here. His idea was to implement what the humans are understood so far about the cosmos. And he very nicely transformed those into the silver screen with the blend of human emotions. In my opinion, this will replace '2001: A Space Odyssey' for sometime till another one make this way.

I could have not asked a better space travel drama than this, especially when I heard Nolan doing a science-fiction I believed he gonna rock it. He was so true to the science and the human feelings in this film. If you had seen enough movies before like this one, you can recall your memories like the Tom Hanks parts from 'Cloud Atlas'. But still independently stands strong and falls in a never seen before category.

‘‘Maybe we've spent too long
trying to figure all this out with theory.’’

The end scene leaves a hint of a possible sequel. I would be happy if that happen in a near future, but definitely that would be a completely different cinema as per how this one ended. I know his fans want that to happen and so am I.

The visuals were not that great, but simply very good. To see those in digital 3D would have given us a different experience, sadly Nolan was not in favor of that technology. Hoping this movie would get as many as the Oscars nod. Especially not getting into the best motion picture shortlist would be a shame. Like I said I'm no one fan, I just love watching everyone's every movie. I would have went to see it again if it was converted into digital 3D, since I'm modern tech geek when it comes to the films.

It will become a talk of the week, perhaps month all over the world, so don't leave behind when your friends talk about it. What I gonna say is it is a must see asap if you are a movie fanatic like me otherwise Nolan movies does not need anyone's recommendation because his movies usually sell itself like the hot samosa.
People seem to think that if you enjoy a Christopher Nolan movie, you are a fanboy and the film couldn't really be that good. That is not true. He has never made a bad movie, Insomnia is probably his worst and it is still an excellent movie.
Interstellar is up there in his top 3, with The Dark Knight being number 1 and Inception in number 2. I don't think he will ever make a better movie than The Dark Knight, it is without a doubt a masterpiece of cinema in my opinion. It can be enjoyed on so many levels.
I remember seeing Interstellar in the movie theater and being on the edge of my seat the whole time. It was breathtaking but the end left me confused so i walked out disappointed.
Since then i have watched it many times but it only took a second viewing to realize what a great ending it is and here is why. How many people discuss the end, was the wormhole open or closed for him to make it to Brand, what happens next, is there a sequel. I discuss this with people who hate the movie and the debate will still last a good 30 minutes if not more without getting heated. It is a wonderful story told through the eyes of a genius film maker who deserves more than he receives, an oscar would be nice start.
I read hat his next movie is to be released in July 2017, I can't wait to find out everything about it like i have since he began.
If you're unsure about Christopher Nolan, watch his career from the beginning starting with Doodlebug.
Another grandiloquent movie from Christoper Nolan.

The cast is good, and McConaughey performs a role made for himself. The photography is very nice but the movie commits all the same mistakes than previous Nolan's movies. I think mistakes but it may be that they are the points Nolan fans enjoy the most ...

* The story makes you believe it is a realy deeply thought plot but, in the end, it has so basic mistakes and stupidities that make it nonsensical.
* There is a general ambience of every moment being epic; deep, solemn and smart dialogues but, at some point our highly trained engineer and pilot behaves really stupidly.
* To keep the mentioned constant feeling of being in an epic moment, Nolan uses a thumping and insistent soundtrack. As it is not a moment, but a 3h movie, it is really tiresome.

All in all, the movie is OK but you can only think this is a great movie if you are a real Nolan fan.
"Man kind was born on earth, it was never meant to die here."

IT has been two days since I watched it and I still can't get it out of my head. I can safely say that it has been a long LONG time since a movie had this much effect on me after watching it. And the only thing I can think of now is to somehow Re-Watch it again.

This movie was surprisingly different from Christopher Nolan's recent works because they had been great cinematic entertainment pieces catered to a wider audience with a blockbuster approach, this certainly didn't felt like that and hence the polarizing response it got. It is an ambitious project that is not meant to merely entertain, walk into it knowing that. I'll say this though, If it works for you, you'll be in heaven.

The premise of the movie is that Earth is no longer capable of supporting humans on it, we must find a new home to avoid extinction. This scenario is told from a very personal perspective and not from a Global scale like some sort of apocalyptic catastrophe disaster film. At the core of the movie is the Father-Daughter relationship. The movie takes its sweet time to develop it too.

Mathew McConaughey, not surprisingly, gives an amazing performance as the main lead. He really carries the film, some scenes were very emotional due to his great performance. The rest of the cast does a great job as well, especially the Daughter played by Meckenzie Foy. The One character that I never expected to be great was the robot TARS. He also acted as the source of the humor in the movie, well executed, timely and grounded.

Interstellar tackles a lot of themes, Survival, Humankind, Love, Time etc, out of which 'Time' had the biggest impact on me. With relativity being a big part in the film, the whole sequence about it just struck me very deeply and I found new respect for Time. I'm actually at a loss of words to describe it. Also, there is a lot science in it so it can be confusing for many and in Nolan's tradition, it also has twists and mind numbing ending, where the more you think about it, the more numbing it gets.

The visuals of this movie are breathtaking. Great cinematography and CGI. The depiction of wormholes and blackholes and other space entities were the best I have ever seen. They just suck you into the movie. Along with that, you get to listen to one of Hans Zimmer's best scores. The score not only felt personal, going perfectly with the movie, but also different from his recent works. There were times where combination of epic photography and soundtrack made the scenes timeless, like I was completely sucked into it and didn't had a clue about my surroundings. I didn't want those scenes to end.

Alas, the movie was not perfect. My biggest gripe with it is that the pacing and editing was off at times. Some scenes dragged on while others were cut far shorter. The beautiful views of space could have definitely benefited from a few seconds longer onscreen time. Also, I wished there was more space exploration in it.

With all the remakes, rehashes, reboots and sequels we are getting in these times, it is great to see original gems like these. This movie is definitely one of this year's best, one of Nolan's best work and one of the best movie I have seen in recent years.

9.5/10
This was my most anticipated film of 2014, and I was not disappointed.

The story was slightly difficult to follow on the first watch, but that was to be expected in a film dealing with complicated fields such as astrophysics and time dilation. Many didn't find its overall message - that love is the most powerful force in the universe which transcends space and time - to be very appealing, but I thought it was an interesting take on special relativity and how two people can be bound by a common feeling, even when they're in different parts of the universe at different times. I also thought the acting was believable, for the most part, and I didn't think anyone was miscast. I enjoyed the surprise appearance from a certain famous actor about halfway through.

But what really blew me away were the visuals and the soundtrack. I believe it was Quentin Tarantino who once said movies and music go hand in hand; that a moving image complimented by the right piece of music can create art. Well, the visuals in this film, which took my breath away, and the score, which perfectly captured the 'feel' of the cosmos and all its wonder, proved him right. I think this was Hans Zimmer's best work yet, and although I'm not Christopher Nolan's biggest fan, I will continue to follow his work if he can pull off more movies like this.

My only regret was not seeing this film in IMAX.

10/10
That this movie, at the time of writing this, holds an 8.8 rating at IMDb is simply beyond my understanding. Needless to say I did not really like this movie. The story is not very good, the science is ludicrous and the visuals not all that impressive. Maybe the latter would be better in a big theater (I watched this on my home cinema system which has a relatively large screen by European standards) but I am not really sure about that either.

Be warned that the rest of this review might contain a spoiler or two.

The movie starts of with the usual “I told you so” wet dream of the green fanatics on a dying Earth so it is off to a depressing start right away. That is an overused concept today as far as I am concerned. Then they pour it on with a school official claiming that he Apollo missions and moon landings never happened. What the f…? If they wanted to depress the audience right from the start they succeeded, at least with this audience.

The story proceeds with our heroes finding these gravity waves in the sand and by a huge stretch of imagination decrypts them to mean coordinates which leads them to the secret NASA base. Once there Cooper is told that he is their best choice of pilot for a “save the human race” mission through a wormhole. Yeah, right! This guy was former NASA. His whereabouts could hardly been unknown to them. If he was their best choice why would they entrust a mission to save the human race to someone else until he stumbled onto their door? Typical Hollywood nonsense!

The movie is full of this kind of rubbish. Romilly wastes 23 years of his life doing pretty much nothing except deciding not to go into the sleep capsule. The supposedly highly trained and vetted professor that they do find turns out to be a psychopath as well as and idiot almost blowing up the ship when trying to proceed with a docking that all the systems tells him have not succeeded. Then they proceed to dock with the main ship and stop its spin as well as bring it out of orbit around a planet with the shuttles engines. That is one hell of a powerful shuttle not to mention the strength of the docking mechanism! This just goes on. When someone is not doing something illogical or stupid (or both) they sit around talking, philosophizing and dragging the movie forward at snails pace. 169 minutes is way too much for this movie.

The movie ends up in one big time travel mess (okay they do not travel in time, just sends messages through time but still…) during a bunch of psychedelic scenes while traveling through the back hole. Science? Not so much. And what about this totally ludicrous massively illogical and inefficient robot design?

The one good thing I can say about this movie is that the performance of most of the actors, especially Matthew McConaughey, are quite good. For the rest, not my cup of tea.
Again hit produced by christopher nolan after batman.
Storyline is great and also the science theory is perfectly showcased.
This might contain spoilers!
---
Interstellar is my favorite movie. I'm really into space and everything about it, so this movie was my cup of tea.
The soundtrack is the best of the movie. It points out flow of time, which is the most discussed issue in the movie. Special effects are breathtaking. Even with some small mistakes, it is pretty accurate and expectable. There is some visually pleasing cinematography too, including Saturn, the curvature of spacetime or majestic black hole, which is really satisfying. Some scenes are loud and thrilling, but some moments are so quiet, that you actually think, you are in space!
The movie is long but gripping. The plot, although it's complicated, is told easily and understandably. But the end of the movie is difficult to understand, since it contains time loop and time travel at the same time, but if you listen carefully, you will get it. I watched the movie 7 times and I still enjoy it!
"Do not go gentle into that good night; Old age should burn and rave at close of day. Rage, rage against the dying of the light".

The story is about a team of explorers undertakes the most important mission in human history; traveling beyond this galaxy to discover whether mankind has a future among the stars.

Christopher Nolan once said that 2001: A Space Odyssey was his all time favorite film and how he wanted to do a small tribute to he's next film. And then comes a movie called "Interstellar" that will put a smile on Kubrick face if he was alive today, because Interstellar is one of the best movie of 2014 and the best movie experience I've had at the cinema.

I saw this movie in IMAX and all through out this film I felt like I was in space floating around with Mconaughey and Anne Hathaway. I had that feeling that I was going deep into space just like are main character's, going deep into space just like the viewing auditions and me.

The visual effect's in this movie are some of the most stunning, beautiful and Jaw dropping effect's I've seen since 2001: A Space Odyssey. The performances were brilliant, The cinematography was breathtaking and hard to look away. The directing by Christopher Nolan and let me get this out there, this man is a true director; he knows cinema and knows how to interested people into seeing he's films and I'm still shocked that he hasn't won an Oscar yet.

Now most people or critics have said that last third of this movie ruined the movie for them, but I actually like the ending to the movie. It's new for Nolan because he always ends on a deep and cold note, but this movie didn't and I didn't mind it.

My only nick pick with the movie is some of the character's in this movie wasn't all that interesting. Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway and Jessica Chastain are the only character's that to me were interesting and I cared for them, but the rest of the character's I didn't really care for.

Overall Interstellar is a mind-blowing movie with fantastic visual's, interesting story line and the movie will keep you interested till the end.


từ đâu ra Interstellar phim rạp mới Mankind was born on Earth. It was never meant to die here. giấy a4 2014-11-05 phim vtv diên hi công lược Hans Zimmer, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan, Emma Thomas, John Papsidera, Lynda Obst, Lee Smith, Ryan Arndt phim âm thanh địa ngục tập 5 tại đà nẵng phim the witcher học đối chiếu là gì phim phòng ở bình tân phim anh ba khía tập 35 bản chuẩn nhà máy sản xuất thức ăn chăn nuôi bình minh bánh toonies Interstellar thơ Mankind was born on Earth. It was never meant to die here. r cơ bản 2014-11-05 anh học viện ngân hàng Hans Zimmer, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan, Emma Thomas, John Papsidera, Lynda Obst, Lee Smith, Ryan Arndt hướng hoa cường phim nhật ký đa nhân cách nhà máy sản xuất unilever iceland phim kẻ hủy diệt vận mệnh đen tối nữ giới phim ghét thì yêu thôi tập 1.